Along the shores of Traverse City and the surrounding Leelanau Peninsula are dotted several clusters of wind towers. These wind turbines are not new and are barely visible against the horizon of sky and water. They are lit and are visible at night along with the other lights from Traverse City which reflect on East and West Bays which surround the city and the peninsula.

Currently Traverse City Power and Light, the municipal power company, is proposing to build between one and four biomass plants using woody material gasification. The biomass plants would supply energy for Traverse City and beyond.

The proposal has garnered significant opposition from residents who have organized against the project. Opponents have created Michigan Citizens for Energy, The Economy and The Environment (MCE3) to oppose the project and are currently collecting petitions to force the city to allow voters to decide on the proposal rather than the utility's board of directors.

Opponents are concerned about emissions and concerned that four plants, once constructed, would burn 133,000 tons of trees annually. Opponents insist that no new plants of any type be built and that conservation is more important.

Interesting that biomass - which local groups and the University of Vermont have identified as potentially feasible as a means of fair, renewable energy that meets Vermont's environmental standards - should be the subject of such antipathy 1,000 miles west of here. Both states are very heavily forested. There is no shortage of the renewable resource of trees.

Is this symptomatic of the prevalence of NIMBY-ism vis a vis any type of alternative energy project with which people are unfamiliar? Or are the Vermonters who are studying biomass for this state wrong? Are the Michigan people overreacting?

Or does the answer lie somewhere in between? Conservation is absolutely critical, but so are alternatives to oil. Are wind turbines okay in Traverse City because they are disbursed in groups of two or three? Is biomass workable in Vermont because heating with wood is already so prevalent?

{loadnavigation}