The expanded Schips program would have cost less than a dollar per person to fund using increased tobacco taxes. Evidently the president is more interested in seeing tobacco companies flourish than American children insured. The bill, as passed by Congress, received high praise from Congressional leaders from both sides of the aisle and received the praise of Republican and Democratic governors around the country.
The fact of the matter is that it is cheaper to insure children than it is to pay for the consequences of not insuring them as they grow older. It's more efficient to insure children through state and federally run programs.
How can the president insist that this program is not worthy of expansion if his tax cuts are worthy of renewal?
{loadnavigation}